AZ-Neu

Manuel A,
Oct, 14^th 2026

NOTE to what's left of MAGA:

You didn't get a wall.
You didn't get to lockup Hillary.
You didn't get to drain the swamp.
You didn't get affordable Healthcare.
You didn't get to eliminate national debt, only raised it.
You didn't get manufacturing back.
You didn't get Epstein files accountability.
You didn't get safer schools.
You didn't get a $5000 DOGE check.
You didn't get a $2000 Tariff check.
You didn't get lower housing and rent prices.
You didn't get lower electric prices.
You didn't get lower gas prices.
You didn't get more or better paying jobs, this President has huge deficit in jobs creation.
You didn't get a better economy.

YOU DIDN‘T GET AMERICA FIRST!!!

BUT
you DID get 6$ gas/gal & 7$ diesel/gal ,
you DID get higher grocery prices ,
you DID get promises NOT kept ,
you got the shaft while he took your Money,

SO
how does your vote for the worst president look now ? ?

AND while you keep waiting, they send your kids off to new wars
AND build themselves a golden ballroom you'll never step foot in!

Out of
Trump Is Encouraging Airlines to Scam Passengers in Every Way Possible
https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/trump-encouraging-airlines-scam-passengers-100000721.html

In a liberal democracy, deliberately under­mining the elec­to­ral sys­tem is one of the gravest harms imagi­nable. The idea that such be­ha­vior would be pro­tec­ted by the right to free speech is contra­dicted by legal pre­ce­dent, com­mon sense, and the very structure of the demo­cra­tic order itself.

NEW YORK – In response to the federal indict­ment accu­sing Donald Trump of con­spi­ring to over­turn the 2020 US pre­si­den­tial elec­tion and re­main in of­fice, Trump’s lawyers and defen­ders argue that he was merely exer­ci­sing his right to free speech under the First Amend­ment of the US Consti­tution. To under­stand the case, one there­fore must under­stand where free speech ends and cri­mi­nal fraud be­gins. The fact that Trump’s actions con­sisted of words does not make them consti­tu­tio­nally pro­tected. On the con­trary, nume­rous crimes imply li­mits on speech. For example, it is il­legal to lie to law-en­force­ment offi­cials or to a jury, and to mis­re­pre­sent a pro­duct as safe when it isn’t. You may not in­ten­tio­nally in­cite im­mi­nent vio­lence, knowingly de­fame some­one’s re­pu­ta­tion, or re­pre­sent mi­nors in sexually ex­pli­cit ways. These and other in­for­ma­tion-limi­ting laws exist for good rea­son: they pro­tect so­ciety from signi­ficant harms.

Read Full Article ->l